Advertisement
US-China trade war
EconomyGlobal Economy

Explainer | As China widens its export control net, what’s next for rare earths?

China’s critical mineral curbs last week took some by surprise; we examine why they were adopted and what they will mean for global supply

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
1
China’s near-monopoly position in the rare earths supply chain has given it considerable leverage in its trade conflict with the US. Photo: Xinhua
Alice Li

After months of tenuous peace between the US and China – featuring multiple rounds of talks and extensions of a temporary trade truce – recent events had markets and observers briefly worried over a return to the dangerous escalatory spiral averted earlier in the year.

Several punitive measures have been employed or threatened by the world’s two largest economies as they attempt to gain the upper hand in their broader rivalry, but last Thursday’s flurry of announcements from China’s Ministry of Commerce took many by surprise – particularly the expansive export controls imposed on rare earth elements, essential raw materials in the manufacture of hi-tech products.

Here, we unpack the details of these restrictions, why they were introduced, what elements and goods are involved and what the new rules mean for the global supply chain.

Why did China expand its rare earth export controls?

In the immediate aftermath of last week’s announcement, speculation was rife over the cause. Some said it was related to Pakistan’s exports of rare earth elements to the US using Chinese equipment and technology.

Advertisement

But Beijing denied this on Monday, saying Pakistan has been forthright over its mineral trade with the US and dismissing the theory as an “unfounded” attempt to “sow discord” between the traditional Asian allies.

In official communications, China has said the recent move was intended to “refine its export control framework” in light of geopolitical turmoil and the potential uses of rare earths in military equipment.

Advertisement
According to a research note published on Monday by financial services company Gavekal, the move was a response to what Beijing viewed as violations of the tacit consensus both sides had reached after talks in Madrid last month – most notably, the expansion of the US Department of Commerce’s Entity List to cover a wider range of Chinese companies under the list’s strict sanctions.
Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x