Nasa abandons orbital station, plans moon base and nuclear spacecraft

Nasa announced on Tuesday it has cancelled plans to deploy a space station in lunar orbit and would instead use components from the project to build a US$20 billion base on the moon’s surface, while also planning to send a nuclear-powered spacecraft to Mars. US space agency chief Jared Isaacman, an appointee of US President Donald Trump who took charge at Nasa in December, announced an unprecedented array of changes to the Artemis moon programme that would expand humanity’s footprint in space, as the US pushes to return to the moon before China sends its astronauts there around 2030. The plans for the moon base included an aim to send more robotic landers, deploy a fleet of drones and lay the groundwork for using nuclear power on the lunar surface in the next few years. “This revised step-by-step approach to learn, build muscle memory, bring down risk, and gain confidence is exactly how Nasa achieved the near impossible in the 1960s,” Isaacman said, referring to the US Apollo programme. Nasa also disclosed plans to launch a spacecraft called Space Reactor 1 Freedom to Mars before the end of 2028 in a mission it said would demonstrate advanced nuclear electric propulsion in deep space. Nasa called this a major step forward in bringing nuclear power and propulsion from the laboratory to space. Nasa said the spacecraft, once it reaches Earth’s planetary neighbour, would deploy helicopters for exploring Mars. The Lunar Gateway station, largely already built with contractors Northrop Grumman and Intuitive Machines subsidiary Lanteris Space Systems, was meant to be a space station in lunar orbit. “It should not really surprise anyone that we are pausing Gateway in its current form and focusing on infrastructure that supports sustained operations on the lunar surface,” Isaacman told a crowd of foreign delegates, companies and members of Congress at a day-long event at Nasa’s headquarters in Washington. Repurposing Lunar Gateway to create a base on the moon’s surface - a difficult undertaking - leaves uncertain the future roles of Japan, Canada and the European Space Agency in the Artemis programme, three key Nasa partners that had agreed to provide components for the orbital station. “Despite some of the very real hardware and schedule challenges, we can repurpose equipment and international partner commitments to support surface and other programme objectives,” Isaacman said. European Space Agency chief Josef Aschbacher, who attended the event, said he would study the new plans and continue talking to Nasa about them. Lunar Gateway was designed to serve as both a research platform and a transfer station that astronauts would use to board the moon landers before descending to the lunar surface. Nasa’s current plans call for landing astronauts on the moon’s surface in 2028. The changes made by Isaacman in recent weeks on the flagship US moon programme were reshaping billions of dollars’ worth of contracts under the Artemis umbrella, sending companies scrambling to accommodate the extra US urgency as China makes progress toward its own planned 2030 moon landing. Central to the Artemis programme is its astronaut lunar lander programme, with Elon Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin both racing to develop moon landers for Nasa. The two companies, each targeting an initial crewed landing on the moon in 2028, have fallen behind schedule. Isaacman and other senior Nasa officials on Tuesday made little mention of the two companies’ plans to accelerate development of their landers to meet a 2028 astronaut landing deadline. But Nasa’s acting associate administrator Lori Glaze suggested the companies want to dock with the Orion astronaut capsule in a different orbit between Earth and the moon than planned, before ferrying the astronauts to the surface. Glaze said “SpaceX has been considering alternatives of their current Starship design” for the moon lander, “while implementing a more streamlined approach to try and speed things up and pull things forward”. Nasa’s inspector general this month said SpaceX, tapped in 2021 for the first astronaut moon lander under the programme, was two years behind schedule, while the company and Blue Origin face a list of complex engineering challenges before they can fly humans. But as part of the agency’s Artemis shake-up, Glaze said it would use whichever lander was ready first instead of sticking to a predetermined order of mission assignments. The Artemis programme, begun in 2017 during Trump’s first term as president, envisions regular lunar missions as Nasa’s long-awaited follow-up to its first moon missions in the Apollo programme that ended in 1972. The first test of this new momentum was just days away. The Artemis 2 lunar mission was set to be the first crewed fly-by of the moon in more than half a century, with Nasa currently targeting a launch as early as April 1.

Nasa abandons orbital station, plans moon base and nuclear spacecraft

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}Nasa pivots resources to establish a long-term presence on the moon as the US races China

Nasa pivots resources to establish a long-term presence on the moon as the US races China