As Asia’s strategic landscape evolves, what is the Quad’s purpose?
Countries like India can’t afford to let ties with China be defined by a grouping focused on reacting to one power and lacking a broader positive vision
Asia is entering a new strategic era. However, its geopolitical debate remains stuck in the previous one. Across the region, governments are investing in new partnerships, stronger supply chains and greater military capabilities in response to China’s growing power.
Yet a more fundamental question receives far less attention: what kind of regional order are Asian countries actually trying to build? The latest Quad meeting in New Delhi brought that dilemma into sharp focus.
The platform was revived with the promise of shaping the Indo-Pacific’s future. Yet today, its relevance appears increasingly tied to China’s behaviour. Every summit, initiative or declaration seems to draw its urgency from Beijing’s actions rather than from a clearly articulated regional vision of its own. That raises an uncomfortable possibility. Is the Quad more effective at reacting than leading?
The progress it has made should not be dismissed. The grouping has announced initiatives to expand cooperation on maritime security, emerging technologies, supply chains and critical minerals. But activity is not the same as purpose. The question is not whether the Quad is busy. The question is whether it is indispensable.