Advertisement
Hong Kong politics
OpinionHong Kong Opinion
Opinion
Bernard Chan

Scott Pelley’s firing from 60 Minutes offers Hong Kong food for thought

Internal scrutiny and public engagement are a must for institutions to gain support and show they are working in the people’s best interests

3-MIN READ3-MIN
1
Listen
Scott Pelley, former CBS journalist, is seen in New York City on May 15, 2013. Photo: AP
Bernard Chan, born in 1965, is a Hong Kong businessman.
Before Scott Pelley was fired from 60 Minutes last week, he accused CBS’s editor-in-chief of “murdering” the programme he had served for over two decades. For a show that once defined hard-edged journalism, his dismissal raises questions about what institutional independence means.

The split followed a tense staff meeting in which Pelley confronted the show’s new executive producer. In a statement after his firing, Pelley said the organisation was becoming more policitised and tried to get him to inject bias into his work. Two other employees who were dismissed have also spoken of corporate and political pressure being felt in the newsroom – claims CBS denies.

These concerns are not abstract; 60 Minutes covered the protests in Hong Kong in 2019, profiling Jimmy Lai Chee-ying as a global symbol of resistance to Beijing. The story was often framed as a straightforward struggle for democracy.
Advertisement

In reality, the picture was more complex. Closer integration with the Chinese mainland brought economic pressures – fiercer job competition, higher rents and rising living costs. Those who highlighted these concerns remained largely at the margins.

I was interviewed for that report, but the narrative seemed predetermined. Only a small portion of what I said aired, with much of the context missing.

Advertisement

It left me wondering how much room there is for independent judgment – not only in newsrooms, but in other institutions.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x