Advertisement
United States
OpinionWorld Opinion
Hao Nan

Opinion | In the Indo-Pacific, ‘America first’ looks like American unpredictability

The Trump administration’s unclear foreign policy aims are prompting US partners to look beyond security alignment with Washington alone

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Illustration: Craig Stephens
Within around 10 days in late May, three top US leaders – US President Donald Trump, US Vice-President J.D. Vance and US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth – delivered speeches that together outlined the administration’s evolving foreign policy vision.
Taken separately, each speech reaffirmed the US’ commitment to strength and strategic deterrence. Yet when considered as a whole, they exposed a deep tension at the heart of America’s global posture – especially in the Indo-Pacific. For America’s allies and partners in the region, these mixed messages raise questions about reliability, strategic clarity and long-term alignment.

At West Point on May 24, Trump reiterated his “America first” doctrine, denouncing foreign entanglements and “absurd ideological experiments”. He asserted that under his leadership, the military will refocus on core missions: “crushing America’s adversaries, killing America’s enemies, and defending our great American flag”.

Advertisement
This was paired with an aggressive military posture. Trump emphasised overwhelming strength, boasting of new planes, tanks, drones and the creation of a Golden Dome missile defence shield. For regional allies, this blend of retrenchment and military escalation signals a shift from global stewardship to transactional power projection.

A day earlier at the US Naval Academy, Vance presented similar realist rhetoric to Trump’s, adding a bureaucratic lens. He said past leaders abandoned hard power for soft power and praised the administration’s use of force in Yemen as a model of clarity and decisiveness.

Advertisement

The US vice-president also spoke of great-power competition, especially with China, and advocated maintaining a technological edge through investment in hypersonics, drones and battlefield innovation. This fusion of restraint and readiness further muddies the message: Is America stepping back from global policing or simply recalibrating how it asserts dominance?

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x