Advertisement
The Philippines
This Week in AsiaPolitics

Can the Philippines ‘Trump-proof’ its US alliance to deter China?

A new report warns that the Philippines still lacks the tools to counter China without a dependable US defence partner

Reading Time:4 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
8
(From left) Philippine military chief General Romeo Brawner, US ambassador to the Philippines Marykay Carlson, Philippine defence minister Gilberto Teodoro and US Marines Lieutenant General Michael Cederholm watch a video presentation during the closing ceremony of the annual Philippines-US joint military exercise “Balikatan” in May. Photo: AFP
Alan Robles
Manila has spent billions on modernising its armed forces, but a new report warns the Philippines still leans too heavily on American protection – a gamble fraught with risk as US President Donald Trump repeatedly questions the value of old alliances.
The Southeast Asian nation’s ability to counter China’s growing assertiveness remains in doubt, according to the assessment by the Brussels-based International Crisis Group think tank, which found that the Philippines’ security strategy is still based largely on diplomacy and alliances, above all its Mutual Defence Treaty with the United States.

Analysts warn this reliance leaves Manila exposed to Washington’s shifting priorities under Trump, whose unpredictability has raised concerns about America’s willingness to support Manila in a crisis.

Advertisement

How far the Philippines should go in reinforcing its military and expanding security partnerships is unclear. Some caution that a stronger deterrent could entangle the country in a potential future conflict with China. Others argue that greater diversification of allies is essential to reduce dependence on the US.

The Crisis Group report, released on August 12, highlights the challenge of “grey zone” tactics, defined as “operations intended to test, provoke and fatigue Philippine forces without crossing the line into acts of war”.

Advertisement

It said these activities by China had raised doubts about how Washington would interpret the defence treaty’s obligations, which commit both signatories to come to the other’s aid in the event of an attack by a third party.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x